Study shows neurobiological effects of providing support to others.
Providing “targeted” social support to other people in need activates regions of the brain involved in parental care may help researchers understand the positive health effects of social ties, according to a study  in Psychosomatic Medicine: Journal of Biobehavioral Medicine, the official journal of the American Psychosomatic Society. The journal is published in the Lippincott Portfolio by Wolters Kluwer.
By comparison, providing “untargeted” support such as giving to charity does not have the same neurobiological effects, according to the new research by Tristen K. Inagaki PhD, and Lauren P. Ross BA, of University of Pittsburgh. “Our results highlight the unique benefits of giving targeted support and elucidate neural pathways by which giving support may lead to health,” the researchers write.
Study may show neural pathway by which providing support improves health
The researchers performed a pair of experiments to evaluate brain responses to providing different kinds of social support. In the first study, 45 volunteers performed a “giving support” task where they had a chance to win rewards for someone close to them who needed money (targeted support), for charity (untargeted support), or for themselves. As predicted, participants felt more socially connected, and felt that their support was more effective, when giving targeted social support.
The subjects then underwent an emotional ratings task including functional MRI scanning to assess activation of specific brain areas when giving social support. Providing support, regardless of who received the support, was linked to increased activation of the ventral striatum (VS) and septal area (SA) – regions previously linked to parental care behaviors in animals. However, only higher activation of the SA when people gave targeted support was associated with lower activity in a brain structure called the amygdala – sometimes linked to fear and stress responses.
In the second study, 382 participants provided information on their behavior in giving support (prosocial behavior) and underwent a different emotional ratings task with functional MRI scanning. Once again, those who reported giving more targeted support to others also showed reduced activity in the amygdala. In both studies, giving untargeted support (such as giving to charity) was unrelated to amygdala activity.
“Humans thrive off social connections and benefit when they act in the service of others’ well-being,” according to the authors. A previous study  by Dr. Inagaki, also published in Psychosomatic Medicine, found that giving social support has positive effects on brain areas involved in stress and reward responses. That study suggested that providing support – not just receiving it – may be an important contributor to the physical and mental health benefits of social support.
The new study adds further evidence that giving targeted support may be uniquely beneficial. Both targeted and untargeted support are linked to increased SA activity, supporting the “warm glow” theory of providing support: we help others, directly or indirectly, simply because it “feels good.”
But the link between increased SA activation and decreased amygdala activity “suggests a neural pathway by which giving support ultimately influence health that is specific to targeted forms of support-giving, such as giving to specific people we know are in need,” Dr. Inagaki and Ms. Ross write.
The authors note that their study cannot show a cause-and-effect of providing support on activation of the SA or amygdala. They also point out that providing targeted social support does not always lead to improved health – for example, prolonged caregiving for an ill family member can be detrimental to health.
The study adds to previous evidence that providing social support to others “may be an overlooked contributor to the well-known link between social ties and health,” Dr. Inagaki and Ms. Ross write. They conclude: “Giving targeted support to an identifiable individual in need is uniquely associated with reduced amygdala activity thereby contributing to understanding of how and when giving support may lead to health.”
Source EurekAlert! American Association for the Advancement of Science AAAS
The neurodevelopmental precursors of altruistic behavior in infancy, Tobias Grossmann, Manuela Missana, Kathleen M. Krol. Published: September 25, 2018. PLOS Biology. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005281
Exercise, Eat Well, Help Others: Altruism’s Surprisingly Strong Health Impact in Scientific American
For the first time, a neural link between altruism and empathy toward strangers in University of Pennsylvania
Giving Support to Others—Not Just Receiving It—Has Beneficial Effects in Wolters Kluwer
Better to Give than to Receive? With Social Support, Balancing Both is Key in USC Leonard Davis School of Gerontology
A new project shows combining childcare and aged care has social and economic benefits in The Conversation
Survey casts doubt on whether giving really is better than receiving in The Irish Times
Why these university students love living with seniors in CBC News
‘They give us life!’: Seniors get boost from weekly play dates in CBC News Ottawa
Symbiosis: Grad Students and Seniors Co-Housing Program in McMaster University
Sensitive babies become altruistic toddlers in Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences